May 18, 2004
Following Protocols
Protocols was one of the first Jewish blogs I read consistently. Started by a handful of guys from my alma mater, Protocols provided a consistent source of news and witty banter relating to the goings-on of the Jewish world, with a focus on the Orthodox community. There is no question in my mind that, sometime last year, Protocols was, by far, the best Jewish blog on the Internet. There was no better resource for Jewish-related current events online. Period.
And then things started to change. Even before the guest bloggers started, I noticed a change that, to me, signaled the end of Protocols. Weiss started talking more about topics like blogging and journalism, less about Israel, YU or Lakewood. There were other, more subtle, signs; there was no question that things had changed. Then the guest bloggers started. I can't say I cared very much for what any of them had to say (other than Uri, who had one of the most thought-provoking posts in Protocols' history). Nothing against any of them in particular, I just don't think they were coming from the same place myself and others who had been reading Protocols for a while were coming from. The latest guest blogger, enigmatic to say the least, brought a tone to the table which turned me off even more. Protocols has morphed into a sort of collective Jewish journalism experiment; while that might be a worthy endeavour in it's own right, it's not what I read Protocols for.
With Weiss heading off to Fiddish (what does that mean? Is that a contraction of "Forward Yiddish?"), Protocols is, in my mind, finished. I've been reading Fiddish, but Weiss has changed his tone considerably; he sounds like the Jewish version of Gawker, a far cry from the irreverant yeshiva bocher days of yore. That's fine, especially if it puts food on the table; a man's got to eat, after all. But I'll miss following the Protocols of old.
I don't normally read Protocols, however, someone mentioned to me that they've been going downhill recently. When I saw that Luke had basically posted ography, I was like 'whoah!' I guess its a good thing I've never linked to them in my blog, and now I know I never will.
Posted by: aishel at May 19, 2004 10:00 AMI too have been dismayed by the decline in quality of Protocols. But I have been kinda following the whole Luke thing and watching the comments more than the actual posts. I wonder if he is acctually serious in his posts, or if he is just trying to drum up conversation.
Posted by: ravomess at May 19, 2004 10:33 AMI think LF was trying to a bit of Andy Kaufman - acting so crazy that you're unsure if he is kidding or not. I suspected early on in his stint as guest blogger that this was his intention, and he came out at the end and basically said it. While I admire his tenacity, I think he misjudged the audience. I didn't care for it at all.
Posted by: Greg at May 19, 2004 10:56 AMYeah, I read that Andy Kaufman thing. Note to Luke: You're not Andy Kaufman, don't try to be. He was (IS?!?!) an individual and it doesn't work to try to copy his style of comedy.
Posted by: peninah at May 19, 2004 11:30 AM